By David Rowley, Investment Magazine, 23 April, 2015<\/p>\n
Australian Super is rapidly redefining the limits of what a large Australian institutional fund can be.<\/p>\n
Projected to double its $84 billion size in four to five years\u2019 time, it is turning itself increasingly into a self-sufficient investor. While many in the industry might marvel or be shocked at each step of its evolution \u2013 both Mark Delaney and head of equities Innes McKeand were treated with hostility at public conferences after the decision to manage some Australian equities internally was announced \u2013 Delaney talks about these changes in a calm, methodical manner, as if it was the most logical and safest course of action.<\/p>\n
A 45 bps target for fund management costs<\/p>\n
Delaney has a problem that only David Neal at the $100 billion plus Future Fund is aware of; that of the increasing difficulty of placing money with its chosen fund managers, due to capacity constraints. He describes the situation in a simple demand and supply way.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou cannot get sufficient size with quality managers, which tells you there is excess demand for quality management services in the current marketplace.\u201d<\/p>\n
He is also aware of the disproportionate impact Australian Super has on the profit margins of fund managers and that it is not always enjoying economies of scale as the size of its external mandates increase. By contrast for managing assets in-house the economies of scale work the opposite way. \u201cThe cost of building your capability (in-house) does not go up at the same rate as your fees go up,\u201d Delaney says.<\/p>\n
The role model for going in-house is provided by leading Canadian pension funds which have whittled down fund management fees to roughly 40 basis points. Delaney\u2019s target is a 15 bps cut in fund management costs, which would lead to total fund management costs of 45 bps.<\/p>\n
As each of the internal teams for Australian equities, global equities, fixed income, property and infrastructure becomes funded up to the point of their full capabilities then the savings in costs will be maximised. The fund has a target of running 35-40 per cent of its assets in-house by 2018. As of the end of June 2014, the fund disclosed a total of $7.1 billion of internally run assets, which represents 9 per cent of its total $78 billion assets.<\/p>\n
So, as Delaney admits, in the early years the costs of the internal team will be \u201ca bit lower than external, but not substantially lower\u201d.<\/p>\n
The savings will also vary depending on the asset class. The Queensland Motorways deal completed in April 2014, which is worth around $1.5 billion to the fund, has only required one extra person in the internal infrastructure team on the payroll. The moving in-house is happening in fits and starts; in one week in March, two large property deals in Hawaii and London worth about $1.5 billion increased the amount managed on a direct or co-investment basis by Australian Super by 1.7 per cent.<\/p>\n
One criticism that might be made of this industrial-sized internal management is that it leaves asset allocation inflexible. Delaney is not too concerned. \u201cWill we always invest in Australian equities? Most likely. Will we always invest in global equities and fixed interest? Most likely,\u201d he says. \u201cIn the 14-15 years we have been investing, not much has changed, but sure, you need to be aware of new opportunities and be flexible.\u201d<\/p>\n
Industry concerns<\/strong><\/p>\n All this growth suggests Australian Super will one day be self-sufficient in fund management, but that is not in Delaney\u2019s vision. \u201cIf you are a quality manager you have nothing to be concerned about,\u201d he says. \u201cWe are not proposing to terminate one of our existing managers because we are doing internal management. We want to hang on to those high quality managers.\u201d<\/p>\n Delaney gave an insight into his process for hiring and firing managers in answer to a recent request made by Investment Magazine to confirm if a manager had been sacked. This followed after IM was anonymously approached with information about an admired international equities fund manager and an Australian equities manager that was in the process of being dropped by Australian Super. Mark Delaney turned down a request to confirm whether this had taken place and here he explains why.<\/p>\n \u201cWe hire managers with the best intentions, sometimes it works very well and sometimes it does not. Or, our circumstances might change in terms of what we do with the whole portfolio. That is pretty much our business and we do not want to affect the manager\u2019s business by making any public comment about what we do.<\/p>\n \u201cIf it were a modest fund manager and Australian Super withdraws a mandate it is a pretty big business for that firm. How would they like it if we then put out a press release saying we have withdrawn the mandate, because we have all these problems? That would just be terrible. It is not fair to the manager to do it. It will just kill their business. The trustees of other funds will say \u2018Australian Super have done it\u2019 why haven\u2019t you?\u201d<\/p>\n Staffing<\/strong><\/p>\n The success of managing money internally rests on hiring the right people. Delaney estimates that around three-quarters of its 115 strong investment team come from fund managers, and recruiting them is not a problem.<\/p>\n \u201cPeople are attracted to the sense of mission we have at Australian Super to grow people\u2019s retirement savings,\u201d he says. \u201cYou do not have to focus on returns and the profitability of your fund management business and sales, or returns to unit holders and shareholders. For those that really love investing, this is a nice niche for them \u2013 because all we do is investing.\u201d<\/p>\n The remuneration offered for such staff is \u201ccompetitive\u201d, but for those that have come into fund management driven to make enormous amounts of personal wealth, this is clearly not the place to come to, admits Delaney.<\/p>\n Building the global equities team<\/strong><\/p>\n If the moves to co-own property and infrastructure are unexceptional, the moves to run large and small-cap Australian equities in-house and to seek an opportunistic role in bank loans are logical, the area that most looks like new territory is running a global equities team in-house.<\/p>\n Delaney admits to being nervous. \u201cThere is an anxiety as everyone is watching us and we cannot fail, but that is no different to investing anyway,\u201d he reasons. \u201cIf you fail you should not be in the business.\u201d<\/p>\n The move has been in the planning stage for a while. Richard Ginty was hired as a strategic advisor for global equities almost a year ago and by the end of 2015, Australian Super plans to have a nine-strong internal global equities team in place. Ginty had worked for close to 20 years at Mondrian Investment Partners in London, firstly as a research analyst and European portfolio manager, finally as a global equity portfolio manager, where his team at Mondrian ran $26 billion in non-US equity global equity portfolios. The plan is that he will run a vanilla global equity portfolio for Australian Super out of the Melbourne office.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are not proposing to have a large style bias,\u201d says Delaney. \u201cIt will not be a value, growth or quant approach. It will be a core style, based upon fundamentals with a medium-term perspective. The exact working out of how that gets manifested will depend on the team coming together.\u201d<\/p>\n Ginty is building some of the team from his contacts in London, some from around the world and some from Australia.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Australian market for international analysts for equities is improving, but it is still relatively small, relative to the global market,\u201d says Delaney. \u201cRichard\u2019s natural starting point was talking to people in the UK.\u201d<\/p>\n Some of the anxiety about taking on such a venture has been tempered by the success of the Australian equities team.<\/p>\n \u201cYou learn by doing,\u201d says Delaney. \u2018We hired the people, Shaun Manuell (the portfolio manager for Australian equities) is experienced, and the performance is solid. We realised we could hire people, they would fit in, it is not too different from what we currently do and they will integrate with the total investment approach.\u201d<\/p>\n Governance<\/strong><\/p>\n Many would say the extra responsibility of these in-house teams poses an extra governance burden onto the Australian Super board and that they should have greater resources, such as independent investment specialists to join an oversight committee.<\/p>\n Delaney does not think that is necessary. Firstly, he says, the oversight of the investment team by the board has changed.<\/p>\n \u201cYou focus more responsibility on oversight and where it should take place,\u201d he says. \u201cSo rather than every investment decision going to the investment committee which is what used to be the case, that is no longer the case.\u201d<\/p>\n Delaney also gives credit to the quality of trustees the fund has had since he joined in 2000 and their ability to manage complexity. He cites former trustees such as Bernie Fraser, Barry Hughes who had served as Keating\u2019s economic adviser and Geoff Ashton who was chair of Leighton Holdings. And the experience of current investment committee members such as John Ingram who is head of the Crane Group and Nixon Apple\u2019s experience in trade and private equity.<\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t think managing Australian Super is more complicated than managing the Australian economy, as Bernie Fraser used to do,\u201d says Delaney.<\/p>\n As such there has been a drive to maintain the same quality on the investment committee and to internally delegate more of Delaney\u2019s decision making to the investment team.<\/p>\n \u201cI used to make all the investment recommendations when the fund was $3 billion in size, but that is not sustainable or a sensible approach at $90 billion, because all the other talented people we have got working in the team can do as good a job.\u201d<\/p>\n The role of the investment committee at Australian Super is to set strategic asset allocation ranges for each investment option, to monitor performance and the risk and liquidity constraints of each investment option. It approves investment guidelines, asset class strategies and large direct investments and makes recommendations as appropriate to the board. Its members are Peter Burn (AI appointed alternate director and economist), Nixon Apple (ACTU appointed alternative director and economist), Tim Poole (independent director and investment expert), Brad Crofts (AWU appointed alternate director and economist), John Ingram (AI appointed employer representative director) and Brian Daley (ACTU appointed member director).<\/p>\n Overseas offices<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cPart of this process involves expanding the platform and processes to enable the fund to invest in around 50 international markets.\u201d<\/p>\n Australian Super is exploring the possibility of following in the footsteps of large Canadian pension plans such as Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board by opening up overseas investment offices. This is not so much about acquiring new assets overseas, but managing them.<\/p>\n \u201cAs the asset base overseas increases then so will the case to have an overseas base,\u201d says Delaney. \u201cOnce we have these co-investments we will have to manage them as a co-owner, not as an investor.\u201d<\/p>\n Additionally, sending team members over for months at a time is not ideal.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you are looking at a UK property asset and someone has got to go for three months and they have a young family and they have to go back again for another two months, that is not really a sustainable outcome. You have to live there for two years and do the job and then come back.\u201d<\/p>\n The large property assets would be best managed from offices in Europe and the US, but these offices might also be used for implementing currency trades. Delaney says such hedges and trades are probably best done in the time zone of the relevant currency.<\/p>\n Back in Melbourne, Australian Super has now expanded over the three floors of its 50 Lonsdale Street location; of these, Investments takes up one floor. Delaney says the team structure is pretty much the same as it was in 2009, just with more people. The only change to the structure since that time has been the appointment of Carl Astorri who has joined in the role of head of macro and portfolio construction in the last year.\u00a0 He works alongside Alistair Barker, who shares a similar role.<\/p>\n This leaves the team underneath Delaney as follows; head of equities, Innes McKeand, head of property, Jack McGougan, head of infrastructure \u2013 Jason Peasley, head of income assets John Hopper, head of investment operations \u2013 Peter Curtis and co-heads of macro Carl Astorri and Alistair Barker.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Kaizen Recruitment specialises financial services recruitment across funds management, wealth management, superannuation, investment consulting and insurance. We are based in Melbourne and Sydney.\u00a0<\/span>For assistance or further information please telephone our office at\u00a0+61 3 9095 7157<\/a>\u00a0or\u00a0<\/span>submit an online form<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n